Wedding Favors

Is using Photoshop Cheating?




A Wedding Shower Checklist

Bridal showers are one of many pre-wedding parties and are great fun. They are known as parties with a purpose. The purpose of a shower is to assist the couple in equipping .....



Is Photoshop really cheating

when it comes to photography ethics?







I keep coming across people accusing and being accused of

"cheating" an image by using the wonders of Adobe Photoshop, and

that their work isn't really photography at all, but

another form of art altogether.

Hawaii Honeymoon Vacations - Romanticizing Your Honeymoon!
Hawaii honeymoon vacations could take you to a miracle trip to the most enchanting beaches of Hawaii. There are beaches, long and beautiful across the world but none of them could .....


First of all, my opinion is "so what"? What does it

really matter how the artist or photographer got

to the finished image? As long as it is thought provoking and

pleasing to the eye, and as long as it can be used in any

necessary context for publication if so desired, do we really

need to know how and/or why it was done?



Sure, a hard-core, original style photographer would say that

the true image should be made at the time of capture, as the

event happens and that any later enhancements are misleading to

the end viewer. To that I say "poppycock"!



For me, the only true and real photography is that of

photojournalism, and as I am sure you will agree,

photojournalism should not and must not be tampered with for

monetary gain or to purposely mislead the viewer.



Some of the most awesome and thought provoking photojournalistic

images have stayed in my mind since I was at primary school. One

image that springs to mind is that of a young, naked Vietnamese

girl having just been napalmed during the war, running down a

road.



There would be no reason and no point to further enhance this

image, it tells its own horrific story as it is.



When it comes to photographs as an art form, I guess

photographers have been "misleading" people since the first

"Daguerreotypes" were being made. The famous photo of the

Cottingley Fairies held true for years until being finally

exposed as a fake. Does it matter that it was a fake? The

authors have created one of the most famous images and talked

about legends for nearly a century that will be discussed for

centuries more no doubt!



What about when an interior photographer like myself moves items

of furniture in a house, or adds a bowl of fruit to a room to

enhance the image? What about when we add make up to a model

before a shoot or re-arrange a wedding dress? None of these

images tell the story of a scene as it was when we arrived at

it. All the alterations were made manually to make the image

more pleasing.



So what is the difference between doing it before the

shoot at the scene, or after the shoot in Photoshop? What

is the difference between pulling an obtrusive branch out of

your way for that perfect landscape or simply removing it later

on your PC. Why do wedding photographers carry clothes pegs to

pin back the dress for some formal shots? Is that

cheating?



I am sure also, that when Turner or Constable made their

beautiful paintings, that maybe another ship was added here, or

an annoying, unwanted bush was removed there. In fact it has

been suggested that the "Masters" used optics to project the

models images onto their canvasses when painting "The

Renaissance". This was highlighted when someone pointed out that

everyone including the animals, were left-handed! Is this

cheating?



My whole point to this discussion is that each person who picks

up and uses a camera, digital or film, has their own individual

interpretation of what makes a good photograph, "Photoshopped"

or not! In the same regard, each individual viewer that sees

these images, has their own interpretation of why they

like or dislike the finished product.



For me, this is what makes photography so unique and exciting,

especially in this new digital era. There are so many

combinations, techniques and tools we have at our disposal, that

the bountiful supply of different and beautiful images is

endless. If it weren't for the phrase "beauty is in the eye of

the beholder", and if we all saw things in the same way, the

world would be a very dull and boring place.



When it comes to photography, or any other art form come to

that, do what makes you happy and proud of what you have

achieved, however you got there!



Nick Stubbs www.all-things-photo

graphy.com



About the author:

Nick Stubbs is a professional photographer with over 20 years

experience. He has a site dedicated to helping beginners to

digital photography at www.all-things-photo

graphy.com



The articles and content provided on this website have been contributed by guest authors, and may not reflect the views, opinions, thoughts or beliefs of http://www.wedding-favors.me.uk/ or its staff. We are not responsible for copyright infringements by columnists, writers and authors. We do not necessarily endorse or promote the services, advice or products by, from and mentioned by any authors, writers or columnists. http://www.wedding-favors.me.uk/ will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by a user through the user's reliance on information and advice gained through the articles, interviews, stories, columns, and any and all writings viewed on this website.